HomeFamily Violence & HomicideIrish True Crime: The O’Leary Family Murder

Irish True Crime: The O’Leary Family Murder

On 10 March 1924, a farmer named Michael Walsh was walking through a field in Kilkerran when he made a shocking discovery. Under a bush lay a sack which appeared to contain parts of a dismembered human corpse. A severed head lay some yards away.

Walsh reported the find to the Gardaí and was so badly affected by the horrific sight that he spent time in a mental hospital. Eight pieces of the body lay scattered around the immediate area, some thrown into a river. Gardaí were soon made aware of a farmer from the locality, Patrick O’Leary (40), who had last been seen on the 25 February. They found Cornelius O’Leary (37), brother of the missing man, in a pub in Milltown. The Gardaí accompanied him to the field and showed him the remains. Cornelius seemed surprisingly unperturbed by the grisly sight but identified it as his brother “Yes, this is Pat.”

A few minutes later, he looked again and said: “I do not know whose head it is.” The Gardaí reminded him that he had just identified the head as his brother’s. Con replied “Oh, I am innocent. My hands are clean.” He also told the police that he had not taken part in any murder. The Gardaí had not accused him of anything of the sort and their suspicions were immediately aroused at this unusual reaction.

A Mysterious Murder

There would also be precious little clarity from the other members of the O’Leary family. Hannah and Mary-Anne were asked to identify the head of their brother which the Gardaí laid out on the table in front of them. Both women seemed disinterested, claiming never to have laid eyes on that person before.

The Gardaí urged them to look again and after several minutes Mary-Anne (41) eventually admitted it was her brother. Hannah (38) then followed suit. None of the three siblings seemed surprised by the horrendous sight, nor did they express any sorrow at the butchery of their brother.

At the wake on the following day, a large crowd of mourners was appalled to see various body parts from Patrick’s dismembered corpse strewn around in an open coffin. When informed that there was suspicion against him, Con replied: “I’ll go to heaven, anyway.” One Garda remarked to Hannah, who was known locally as a surly, bad-tempered woman, that it was a terrible case. She replied coolly “Wisha, it can’t be helped.”

A day later, the O’Leary’s dog was seen running past the house holding a human arm stripped of flesh in its mouth. The lack of grief shown by the family was a cause of shock in the area and the Gardaí quickly started to look into the background of the eccentric O’Leary household. It had not been a happy home.

The Dysfunctional O’Leary Family

The father of the family, Patrick, died in 1921 aged 80. He had eight children, one of whom had died. Three others had moved away, leaving Con and Patrick on the farm with their two sisters. Unsurprisingly Patrick Snr. chose to give the forty-acre farm to his widow on his death, instructing that it would next pass to Patrick, the elder son.

Unusually Con, the younger brother, chose not to work at home, laboring instead for local farmer William Travers. Patrick was not happy with this situation, and in August 1922 he went to Travers and complained about it. Travers told Con about this confrontation but Con replied that he would not work for his brother as he would not get paid.

The two brothers did not have a good relationship and had not spoken for several years before the death of their father. Mary-Anne also worked and lodged away from home, leaving Patrick to run the farm, with Hannah and his mother in charge of minding the house. The apparent unwillingness of two of the siblings to work with Pat perhaps shows how the relationship between him and the rest of the family had broken down. Patrick, considered locally to be an awkward man, did not even sleep in the small house as this would have meant sharing a bed with Con.

Instead, he made his sleeping quarters out in the hayloft. Things had come to a head shortly before Patrick’s disappearance when it was said that he had sold cattle at a local fair and had not informed the family about the transaction. The O’Learys believed he was not giving them any money in an attempt to squeeze them out. By the 25 February 1924, relations within the family were toxic.

Patrick was missing for nearly ten days before the body parts were discovered yet no member of the family had alerted the authorities.  Con told Gardaí he had not mentioned it as Patrick often went away and he didn’t take any notice. Mary-Anne said that she expected him to write any day, although she was forced to admit later that her brother was illiterate. After the discovery of the dismembered body, the Gardaí searched the hayloft and found that Patrick’s bed had been freshly made with new bedclothes.

Notwithstanding this, a bloodstained fork was unearthed beneath it and the area also appeared to have been the scene of a violent row, with traces of blood visible in several places, including on the walls and the potatoes in the loft. The Gardaí believed they had sufficient evidence to be confident that a murder had occurred and that it had been committed by a member of the O’Leary family.

A Family Murder

None of the O’Learys would admit to anything, however. For this reason, all four members of the household were arrested, including the elderly mother, Hannah O’Leary. All four were charged with having murdered Patrick O’Leary at some point between the 26 February and the 7 March. This family quarrel turned vicious murder would become the most closely followed murder trial in the history of the new state.

The trial was fixed for Green Street, Dublin on 24 June 1925. Mary-Anne O’Leary had died of natural causes while in custody and the state’s charge against their mother was also withdrawn due to lack of evidence, leaving Con and Hannah to face the court on the murder charge. They were tried jointly with both pleading not guilty.

Con showed a keen interest in the proceedings while Hannah mostly sat bowed, not looking up. The defense argued that there was no evidence and no bloodstains found on any clothing belonging to the accused pair. They added that there was no way the court could know which member of the O’Leary family committed the crime if any and that the real perpetrator may not even be in the courtroom or might have been the recently deceased Mary-Anne.

Neither Con nor Hannah took the stand. Their defense team also refused to call witnesses for the defense, saying that there was no need due to the total lack of evidence that a murder had been committed by either defendant. Mr. Campion, prosecuting emphasized the horrific nature of the death and dismemberment of Patrick O’Leary.

He called the two accused monsters for attempting to blame their deceased sister for the crime and reminded the court of their total lack of interest in the horror that had been inflicted on their brother. The jury deliberated and were deadlocked.

A hasty second trial was convened hearing the same evidence. This jury had no such hesitation, needing only thirty minutes to find both defendants guilty. A recommendation to mercy was given to Hannah, presumably on account of her gender. Con received no such comfort. Hannah and Con O’Leary were thus sentenced to death by Mr. Justice Hanna. Both O’Learys maintained their innocence of the charge.

“I had no hand, act nor part in the murder…I am going to die an innocent man. – Con O’Leary

Hannah answered, “I did not kill my brother.” The two siblings appealed the conviction but after a four-day hearing, their appeal was refused.

On 27 July 1925, just before the sentence was to be carried out, Hannah O’Leary received a last-minute reprieve from the governor-general, and her sentence was commuted to one of penal servitude for life. The cabinets of the day never gave a reason for such commutations, but it was speculated afterward that it was down to her gender.

Leniency for Con O’Leary was not forthcoming, however. He went to the scaffold at Mountjoy Prison on the 28 July at 8 am. The records state his demeanor was “calm,” although the same was said for all condemned prisoners. No Irish execution had been conducted publicly since 1868 and the standard line was that it had proceeded without incident. Whether Con O’Leary or any of the other condemned prisoners really went peacefully to their deaths will never be known.

Hannah O’Leary Jnr. was finally released from prison in September 1942 after eighteen years. She was considered “not quite right” and had no family member willing to accept her on her release. She was thus sent to live out her days with a community of Good Shepherd Nuns.

In February 1924, Hannah O’Leary Snr. shared her home with four of her children. Barely a year later three of them were dead, one of natural causes, one murdered and a third hanged. The fourth was imprisoned in Mountjoy Prison.

By 1927, she was in her mid-seventies and living alone in Kilkerran. She had little choice but to sell on the farm. The new owners wasted little time in destroying the house and sheds, the scenes of unimaginable horror. Hannah O’ Leary Snr. died in the County Home in Clonakilty in January 1928, thus completing the eradication of the entire O’Leary family in West Cork.

The hearse carrying her remains drove through Clonakilty where it was reported that “the only person in attendance was the undertaker.” A fittingly tragic end to a truly horrific case.

Colm Wallace’s book “Sentenced to Death: Saved from the Gallows” about thirty Irish men and women who had the death penalty imposed on them between 1922 and 1985 is published by Somerville Press.

More articles on Crime Traveller by Colm Wallace:  10 Who Escaped the Hangman in Ireland


Author

In a guest post on Crime Traveller Irish teacher and author Colm Wallace tells the remarkable tale of the O’Leary family murder in 1924, Ireland. A brother brutally murdered and dismembered and an emotionless family who appeared unshaken and uncaring towards the fate of their sibling.

JOIN CRIME TRAVELLER

New article updates and our free monthly Newsletter straight into your inbox.

It's free! You can unsubscribe at any time.

Unlimited reading on any device, try Kindle Unlimited from Amazon for free.
Prefer Audiobooks? Audible 30-Day Free Trial with free audiobooks.
As an Amazon affiliate, Crime Traveller may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases. See our Disclaimers page for more information.

4 COMMENTS

  1. I have been surfing online more than 3 hours today, yet I
    never found any interesting article like
    yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be much more useful than ever before.

  2. Hello! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok.
    I’m definitely enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Must Read

Justice For Brianna Ghey: A Murder Trial Unveiling Dark Secrets

The senseless murder of Brianna Ghey exposes the shadowy depths of a false friendship and the sinister fantasies that led to her untimely death.

POPULAR POSTS

4 Shocking True Crime Cases in True Crime Stories: A Prequel

Four gripping and recent true crime cases make up this prequel to Jack Rosewood's True Crime Stories book series, with each chapter more shocking than the last.

Can Criminal Behavior Be Predicted Using Brain Scans?

Modern brain imagining is being used to explore the criminal brain, looking for biological factors which could lead to criminal behavior.

The Mishandled Death Investigation of Christian Hopson

A look at the police investigation into the death of Christian Hopson in Texas in May 2016. Did this young woman commit suicide or was she murdered?

Jack The Ripper Was Three Killers: New Theory in Sherlock Holmes and the Autumn...

The fascinating theory of author Randy Williams supported by three top criminologists that Jack the Ripper was actually three killers working together.

Color Verses Black and White Photographic Evidence In A Murder Trial

New research has indicated that jurors who see colour photographs of a crime scene are more likely to convict of murder than jurors who see black and white versions of the same photographs.
Exit mobile version